Anti-Corruption Strategy: A Civil Society Perspective


This piece is not about another bullet point agenda that directs our governments to take action against corruption. In fact we start with the assumption that federal and provincial governments and their executive branches know very well how to curb corrupt behaviours – yet they don’t do so.

A new stream of discourse argues the need for civil society to exert organized pressure in a manner that forces the elected representatives and their implementing arm (civil service) to remain within bounds. This articleprovides ways in which civil society can create an impact.

“Innovative ideas such as which lets you post your daily life experience with anyone forcing you to pay irregular payments towards facilitating your right.”

Let us start with innovative ideas such as which lets you post your daily life experience with anyone forcing you to pay irregular payments towards facilitating your right. Such forums are trying hard to uncover the market price of corruption and bring this distortion into the limelight through print and electronic media. It was this website where people first started exchanging views about how regional passport offices in Pakistan were now demanding bribes in order to facilitate an early retrieval of passport booklets. Having such forums in fact allows for documenting what works and what does not when dealing with corruption.

Talking of the public sector brings us to another important role that civil society ought to play. We need to demand that proceedings of public sector (ministries, government departments and public sector enterprises) be audited by the Auditor General’s office and should be presented first to the parliament and then to the general public without any time lag. Based on these proceedings and findings civil society can start evaluating the government’s performance. This will also allow independent think tanks in the country to monitor corruption at fairly frequent intervals.

Malpractices in procurement of services or even recruitment of public officials need to be checked on an urgent basis. The pressures on federal and provincial public service commissions are all very well known. There are vast numbers of positions in the public sector in which public service commissions are not even in the loop. Such irregular appointments are not limited to adhoc selections but also permanent positions many of which are in the public sector corporations which are bleeding the national exchequer. The losses of public sector enterprises crossed PKR 1500 billion in the past 2 years. These enterprises include Pepco, Pakistan Railways, Pakistan International Airlines, Pakistan Steel Mills, Utility Stores Corporation, Trading Corporation of Pakistan, Pakistan Agricultural Storage & Supplies Corporation as well as the National Highway Authority. While the focus on public administration is important we should not neglect corporate governance in the public sector.

One should also identify the arbitrariness in the system. This arbitrariness helps to institutionalize corruption across the government machinery. For example the regime of allotment of government land, plots and other entitlements to public sector employees is a system that is rarely documented and evaluated by external auditors. When officials block prime commercial land for their own entitlements business incentives are erased. Pakistan’s national accountability framework is driven by National Accountability Bureau, Federal Investigation Authority and Anti-corruption departments in the provinces. However emphasis is entirely on enforcement and very little on prevention.

Another important step in organizing civil society is to strengthen consumer rights groups. There are substantial inequalities of incomes, consumptions and asset holding in the country which can be curtailed through ensuring transparency and fairness in goods and labour markets. The macro level institutions such as Competition Commission of Pakistan (and other regulatory bodies) and micro level institutions such as price committees need to be: a) strengthened in capacity, b) safeguarded from human interference and c) allowed empowerment with accountability. Civil society can play a role in demanding each of these three measures.

Some rent-seeking entrepreneurs help strengthen a system where arbitrariness blossoms. This happens at the cost of genuine investors for whom the demand for bribe awaits at every step of entry, operation or exit. Many such members of the business community form the core of our tax paying brass. However with no tax payers’ rights cell in the country, our revenue departments at federal and provincial levels are not held accountable for the revenue lost due to corrupt practices of tax officials. The example of telecommunications sector in Pakistan is a classic example of busting sector-wide corruption. Privatization and deregulation in the telecommunications sector took the discretionary powers away from the government, introduced competition in this sector and today we see that the same landline connection that used to take decades to reach the applicants house has been stumped by a mobile phone connection available even with people who live below the poverty line in Pakistan.

“The civil society also has an opportunity to use independent media in helping to curtail corruption. For this to happen investigative journalism needs to be promoted.”

The civil society also has an opportunity to use independent media in helping to curtail corruption. For this to happen investigative journalism needs to be promoted. The civil society institutions can take a lead in developing this cadre and then providing research assistance to media entities. We already see the encouraging example of Pakistan Social Accountability Network (PSAN) whose members devise actions towards demand-side and community-based accountability mechanisms in order to improve service delivery at the grass roots levels.

Finally the civil society needs to be assertive and ensure follow up with accountability departments in the country so that examples can be established. The chain smoker very well knows that this practice is injurious for health, yet many continue to smoke. So awareness alone is not enough and tough precedents should be set and examples must be established.

The author is Research Fellow at Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) and Former Advisor, Planning Commission ([email protected])

6 Responses to “Anti-Corruption Strategy: A Civil Society Perspective”
  1. imran Sheikh says:

    I refused to bribe a government official. A bogus demand was created which I refused to pay, and appealed to the next level. Partial relief and informal advice to be reasonable and play the game resulted. I refused to pay the reduced bill. A penalty was added. Then another, then a third. Then I was threatened with arrest. Not a pleasant situation! I appealed again after paying. After 8 years I got all my money back. I insisted upon, and got some mark-up. My legal fees was covered by this mark up but I lost a substantial amount due to inflation. The officials concerned were promoted in due course. Until the rules require such delinquent officers to be prosecuted automatically when their case is thrown out, and the rules have teeth with consequences for them, such abuse of power will not end .


    The problem pakistan’s democracy is facing for past
    35 years from

    zulfiqhar ali bhutto to nawaz sharif is political stability to achieve this goal it

    has to undergo major political reforms one of them can be the duration of
    government can be reduced from 5 years to 4 years

    this can help cool down the politcal temperature and improve foreign
    investor confidence nawaz sharif you can do it for the long term future of

  3. omema says:

    I would like to add a few points (thoughI can write a whole chapter on this but…). First, we need to understand, what is corruption? From my research (on police, which is perceived as the most corrupt deptt) what I note is that very few public employees comprehend this phenomenon. Most of the Pakistani view only bribery or anything that related with monetary or tangible things are considered as corruption (that also include embezzlement; kickback, etc), and other minor deviances such as giving favor, sleeping on duty, accepting free meals, discrimination, waste and abuse of resources etc, are not all corruption. This is also vivid from number of NAB prosecuted cases. Secondly, we need to diffierentiate between extortion and bribery. The amount that is mentioned (fluctuating) on the website is just extortion, in which the willingness of the corruptee are not involved. What if both parties are willing on a transaction? Will it be reported? I guess not? So, thirdly, we cannot quantify corruption, because these are deals in which two or more parties are involved, and it occurs at different levels (micro-meso-macro). Fourthly. We need to understand the root causes of this menace or as Fida Muhammad (Logic of corruption in Pakistan: A journey from NAB to NRO) called it the logic behind corruption. From my research (focus on micro and meso level) I came to the conclusion that, we need structural changes at organizational level and we have to fulfill the psychological needs of the employees simultaneously; we need to reduce the contact between parties involved; adopt a carrot and stick approach (good salary+punishment on wrongdoings) then I hope we will be able to reduce it (as elimination of corruption is out of question in Pakistan).

  4. Aman says:

    Dr. saheb, a very well written blog post. I agree with you. Countries with a vibrant civil society and credible media have been successful in developing merit-based bureaucratic values, institutionalized competitive politics, inclusive and transparent governance process, public accountability and participation. As civil society is a staunch defender of public interests and a watchdog of government policies and activities, it must be encouraged, strengthened and involved in the formation and implementation of anti-corruption legislations and strategies by the state. Such participatory and collective approach can really make a difference in reducing corruption.

  5. niatwali says:

    In my view, the time has come for Pakistan government to look towards the premier institutions of Pakistan, such as Institute of Chartered Accountants, Institute of Cost and Management Accountants, IBA, LUMS and other such institutions to provide required manpower and with that, the civil society should raise their voice for a separate and completely independent Accountability Institution at federal level and provincial levels, comparable to NAB, but should be governed by an independent body of governors, comprising MDs of Chartered Accountancy Forms, SECP and State Bank of Pakistan. This system should be independent from any sort of political and other affiliations, through proper legislation to that effect,. The said Accountability Institution should be tasked with not only post – corruption cases, i.e. audit, but also be given the task for preventive measures. Once this institution is created, this will frame its own structure, which may include research and public awareness and sensitization etc.etc… The civil society ought to fight for this, rather than raising slogan to strengthen the existing accountability institution, this to me, will have no positive results!

  6. If we really want to stop the Corruption.then first we need a strong Law against the Corruption.

Leave A Comment

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box


August 2017
« Jul