What everyone missed about Nawaz’s disqualification

I was following the news on the disqualification of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif by the Supreme Court on account of the infamous Panama Case. I was checking the reactions on social media. Most of the reactions seemed to only focus on politics. For a lot of people in the online Pakistani community, the concern was primarily the corruption charges and they cheered the decision of the SC.

While the news and social media was busy, the markets started showing jitters. The KSE-100 tanked 3.6% in early trading after the verdict, but as news of Shahbaz Sharif taking over the helm from his brother percolated, the markets bounced back to their previous levels. KSE-100 had already seen a lot of volatility this year, partly due to the listing of Pakistani stocks in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.

What no one was talking about in the media was about the long-term economic impact of political instability. The incident reiterated once again that, rather than the voters re

moving the Pakistani PM, judges, bureaucrats, the military establishment and even assassinations have done that job. To say that the international credit rating agencies, the IMF and MSCI are not watching this event closely is being too naïve.

Despite Pakistani stocks not getting the weightage that they wanted in the MSCI-EM Index (0.10% rather than the expected 0.19%), political stability, a clean handover of the democratic reign from the PPP to PML-N and the ambitious plans/reforms promised by this government, was the primary factor that drove the inclusion. It was also the reason for the IMF to be cautiously ‘optimistic’ about the country.

The Pakistani economy for now is being propped up by a lot of debt whether it was the multiple bailouts from the IMF or Chinese state-owned enterprises investing through CPEC.  Pakistan needs ‘at least’ 4-5% of consistent GDP growth for the next 2 decades to tide over any possibility of a mega-default.

I don’t have much of an opinion on political parties, ideologies or political struggle within Pakistan. But, if the new PM faces similar scrutiny due to the Panama Case or any other case and is weakened or worse removed before his term ends, there will be backlash from international investors. There is a real possibility that rating agencies might downgrade the Pakistani Government Bonds negatively impacting the ability of the State to raise funds to bridge fiscal deficits (Moody’s have already raised concerns). Too much debt is a toxic mix with political instability, and will put pressure on the Pakistani currency leading to more depreciation. The MSCI-EM might also reduce their exposure to Pakistani stocks in their kitty (especially Bank stocks).

Chinese investment is a whole different ballgame, as there is no public data available on what rate of returns or sovereign guarantees the Pakistani government has promised their Chinese counterparts. It’s difficult to comment that, but one can safely guess it will be on the higher side.

There is no political party in the National Assembly that can stand up to the majority that the PML-N holds. Holding another election, if it brings a hung National Assembly might trigger market panic.

In short there are no real good choices.  The best strategy will be to take the least painful path. Pakistani political leaders will have to be careful; they have too much at stake to gamble.

One Response to “What everyone missed about Nawaz’s disqualification”
  1. Gautam Kumar Das says:

    Well-analyzed and well-articulated.

Leave A Comment

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box


January 2018
« Dec